Uploaded image for project: 'Qt'
  1. Qt
  2. QTBUG-12476

SSL Memory leaks (with screenshots + valgrind report).

    XMLWordPrintable

Details

    • Bug
    • Resolution: Duplicate
    • P2: Important
    • 4.7.0
    • 4.7.0
    • Network: SSL
    • None
    • Mac 10.5
    • d4d7f3575c229848f08c7df75a1281755d6c41a8

    Description

      [Update]: this is still a problem on Qt4.7 from the 27th July 2010 - using the test programs enclosed, I can see a memory leak on the client side. I tested using Mac 10.5 where Qt was compiled using -openssl.

      This leak is apparent when using a subclass of the QSslSocket.

      The attached example demonstrates the memory leak, but only with SSL enabled. Non-SSL will use the same class but with no memory leak.

      in order to observe this leak, the server and client in the attached example need to be
      run in separate processes. I just performed a test as follows:

      process 1: >./SSL_Leak_Test 1 1 // this will start a server process
      using SSL

      process 2: > ./SSL_Leak_Test 2 1 // this will start a client process
      using SSL

      where process 2 (the client with the leak) climbs slowly to 9.36MB
      of memory, which is never reclaimed; even after the socket is
      destructed. This is exactly the problem we're having at Filewave.

      I suggest making it more obvious and observable by increasing the
      following parameter in Globals.cpp:
      quint32 LeakGlobals::CLIENT_WRITE_ITERATIONS // from = 50,000 to
      500,000.
      This takes a little while, but you should observe about 52MB of
      memory which is never reclaimed.

      Attachments

        Issue Links

          No reviews matched the request. Check your Options in the drop-down menu of this sections header.

          Activity

            People

              phartman Peter Hartmann (closed Nokia identity) (Inactive)
              johncclayton John Clayton
              Votes:
              1 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              4 Start watching this issue

              Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved:

                Gerrit Reviews

                  There are no open Gerrit changes